Civic hacktivism, Wikileaks, online protests; they’re all founded in the same principle of freedom of speech, which has been around for decades. It’s just teaching an old dog new tricks. Or rather, new dogs, learning the old dogs tricks and reinventing them.
“ʻThe Internetʼ is the new trick. This amazing device – full of youth, verve, and energy” – Anonymous, 2003.
Asking whether sites like Wikileaks is wrong, is not a new debate. It’s an old debate, reinvigorated. Speaking out against Governments or revealing the truth behind what the mass media tells us has been going on for years, the digital age and the Internet have just given news means of doing so, and effectively made it easier to reach the “uninformed masses”. Therefore I believe the debate lies in the effectiveness of it.
There is a big difference between one lone user calling himself a civic hacktivist by having a rant on his blog, and a site like Wikileaks.
About 7 years ago a group emerged known as “Anonymous”. They were a group of people, essentially functioning as single entity, focused on hacktivism. The group is primarily composed of members from forums and image boards, however they have no single location or base. There is no leader, anyone can join and work towards the same collective goal as the rest of the group. They became famous however, through “Project Chanology”; their protest against Scientology.